User talk:KrytenKoro: Difference between revisions
→New Template Suggestion
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
:::That being said, I'm not in charge of anything -- if the community doesn't want to wait on Shard and me, let us know and we'll revise the template to have MAX coverage.[[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] ([[User talk:KrytenKoro|talk]]) 11:35, 14 June 2016 (PDT) | :::That being said, I'm not in charge of anything -- if the community doesn't want to wait on Shard and me, let us know and we'll revise the template to have MAX coverage.[[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] ([[User talk:KrytenKoro|talk]]) 11:35, 14 June 2016 (PDT) | ||
For what it's worth, I think that MAX coverage would be convenient. I, too, see the patterns and think that it would be easy enough to run the formula once someone spelled it out algebraically, but it'd be nice for just anyone to see the maximums at a glance. They could use the info to validate my medal guide, too.[[Special:Contributions/72.172.203.139|72.172.203.139]] 08:39, 17 June 2016 (PDT) | For what it's worth, I think that MAX coverage would be convenient. I, too, see the patterns and think that it would be easy enough to run the formula once someone spelled it out algebraically, but it'd be nice for just anyone to see the maximums at a glance. They could use the info to validate my medal guide, too.[[Special:Contributions/72.172.203.139|72.172.203.139]] 08:39, 17 June 2016 (PDT) | ||
::::Out of curiosity, what would the stats be used for? The current template sorts all medals by strength, defense, and special attack damage, so as far as tier sorting by that, you'd get the same results with 6* LV 1 and 6* MAX. (Not asking to shoot down your request, but to make sure the template is properly serving needed utilities.)[[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] ([[User talk:KrytenKoro|talk]]) 09:43, 17 June 2016 (PDT) | |||
== Musketeer medals == | == Musketeer medals == | ||