Template talk:JPSets: Difference between revisions
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
:::::::How's [[Template:Set7/Draft|this]]? Much tighter, and the colored text both mirrors how attributes are displayed in-game (PSM within UR), and allows the reader to quickly pick out medals by one attribute alone, accomplishing the goal of organizing them by attribute. It also has mouseover text labeling the Limited and Event Medals (though I am starting to think we should instead use some sort of superscript, in case readers don't realize they need to mouseover). See [[Template:Set7/Draft2|this]] for such a design. | :::::::How's [[Template:Set7/Draft|this]]? Much tighter, and the colored text both mirrors how attributes are displayed in-game (PSM within UR), and allows the reader to quickly pick out medals by one attribute alone, accomplishing the goal of organizing them by attribute. It also has mouseover text labeling the Limited and Event Medals (though I am starting to think we should instead use some sort of superscript, in case readers don't realize they need to mouseover). See [[Template:Set7/Draft2|this]] for such a design. | ||
:::::::Also, now that I understand Rikki's proposal better, I also agree with a full-album navbox, instead of one for each set.[[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] ([[User talk:KrytenKoro|talk]]) 06:26, 9 June 2016 (PDT) | :::::::Also, now that I understand Rikki's proposal better, I also agree with a full-album navbox, instead of one for each set.[[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] ([[User talk:KrytenKoro|talk]]) 06:26, 9 June 2016 (PDT) | ||
{|style="border: 3px double #9e379f; width: 100%; margin: 0 auto; text-align: justify; padding: 10px; border-radius:7px;" | |||
|Yes, I agree that keeping them in order of ID in the navbox is a good idea if we remove the numbers. As to this navbox vs wikipedia... I think the wikipedia navbox is easier to edit and customize, but your mileage may vary. I greatly prefer the wikipedia navbox. | |||
My reasoning to have only a few navboxes instead of a million, is that if I'm just browsing I would be able to view ''all'' the medals from [[Wakka]]s page and every other medal page, just from the navbox. I wouldn't be forced to go looking all around the wiki for them. To that end, a central directory of medals is a great idea and there's no reason not to have one ''with'' a navbox. Obviously, on the [[Medal]] page itself we'd have the directory and not the navboxes, but the navboxes are great to have on the individual medal pages especially to get around. | |||
Honestly, I had to go to the url of Set6 where I found myself, and enter 1-10 to view all the sets that we have on the wiki, which is a pain. (In hindsight I could have gone to the Medal page, but I didn't think of that at the time). So, having a navbox with ''all'' the sets is better in my opinion, especially since we ''can'' make it compact. I like [[Template:Set7/Draft|the draft]] a lot, too. The way they're boxed in to show upright or reverse medals is very nice. Can we do both mouseover and superscript? Are you thinking just letters like: [[Beast WD Ver.|<span title="Event Medal" style="color:red; border:1px solid yellow;">Beast WD Ver.<sup><small>E</small></sup></span>]] or the entire word? Letters would be more compact, of course. | |||
As for the sets themselves...I kind of understand why we have them, but it just seems somewhat arbitrary since as you pointed out it may mean different things. Personally, I think a set is one released all together, not released here and there over the course of month or two. -[[User:Rikki21|'''<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#B452CD">Rikki</span>]][[User talk:Rikki21|<span style="color:#FF0066">21</span>]]''' 11:32, 9 June 2016 (PDT) | |||
|} | |||