Line 94: Line 94:
:It would definitely be doable -- the main issue that Shard and I had been discussing is that there definitely seems to be a generic progression (meaning you should always be able to calculate max stats given the 6* stats), and so we could conceivably just cover the progression on the main [[Medal]] page. We're still playing with the numbers to find the best fit curve, but if it turns out we're wrong, we would agree to going back to having max stats.
:It would definitely be doable -- the main issue that Shard and I had been discussing is that there definitely seems to be a generic progression (meaning you should always be able to calculate max stats given the 6* stats), and so we could conceivably just cover the progression on the main [[Medal]] page. We're still playing with the numbers to find the best fit curve, but if it turns out we're wrong, we would agree to going back to having max stats.
:::That being said, I'm not in charge of anything -- if the community doesn't want to wait on Shard and me, let us know and we'll revise the template to have MAX coverage.[[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] ([[User talk:KrytenKoro|talk]]) 11:35, 14 June 2016 (PDT)
:::That being said, I'm not in charge of anything -- if the community doesn't want to wait on Shard and me, let us know and we'll revise the template to have MAX coverage.[[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] ([[User talk:KrytenKoro|talk]]) 11:35, 14 June 2016 (PDT)
For what it's worth, I think that MAX coverage would be convenient. I, too, see the patterns and think that it would be easy enough to run the formula once someone spelled it out algebraically, but it'd be nice for just anyone to see the maximums at a glance. They could use the info to validate my medal guide, too.[[Special:Contributions/72.172.203.139|72.172.203.139]] 08:39, 17 June 2016 (PDT)


== Musketeer medals ==
== Musketeer medals ==