Talk:Starlight: Difference between revisions

145 bytes added ,  5 May 2016
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 322: Line 322:
::Looking at it on both a tablet and phone it looks fine on both desktop and mobile views. The mobile on the phone may require you to slide you screen to the side to see the rest of the materials needed to upgrade, but that's hardly a problem and certainly easier than moving down and down and down which is what you have to do with the current set-up. Not only that, but this table allows readers to quickly find what they're looking for. Honestly, the only table of contents that should be that long should be something like a Gameplay page. I understand why it was done here, but if a person doesn't know exactly what upgrade they want information for they have to go through each upgraded table looking for it, whereas this table is compact and you can easily find whatever you're looking for with only a glance or two. I think this set up is more practical when viewing on a mobile than what's currently there, but YMMV. [[User:Rikki21|Rikki21]] ([[User talk:Rikki21|talk]]) 15:42, 5 May 2016 (PDT)
::Looking at it on both a tablet and phone it looks fine on both desktop and mobile views. The mobile on the phone may require you to slide you screen to the side to see the rest of the materials needed to upgrade, but that's hardly a problem and certainly easier than moving down and down and down which is what you have to do with the current set-up. Not only that, but this table allows readers to quickly find what they're looking for. Honestly, the only table of contents that should be that long should be something like a Gameplay page. I understand why it was done here, but if a person doesn't know exactly what upgrade they want information for they have to go through each upgraded table looking for it, whereas this table is compact and you can easily find whatever you're looking for with only a glance or two. I think this set up is more practical when viewing on a mobile than what's currently there, but YMMV. [[User:Rikki21|Rikki21]] ([[User talk:Rikki21|talk]]) 15:42, 5 May 2016 (PDT)
:::It still needs to be much thinner. As far as the TOC goes, we can easily resolve that by just adding the "notoc" template.[[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] ([[User talk:KrytenKoro|talk]]) 16:25, 5 May 2016 (PDT)
:::It still needs to be much thinner. As far as the TOC goes, we can easily resolve that by just adding the "notoc" template.[[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] ([[User talk:KrytenKoro|talk]]) 16:25, 5 May 2016 (PDT)
::::Also, I really don't think we should use colspan here.[[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] ([[User talk:KrytenKoro|talk]]) 16:26, 5 May 2016 (PDT)